Autocratic Leadership | Characteristics, Pros and Cons

Autocratic Leadership

Autocratic leadership is a sort of leadership where one person makes a choice and others have to follow it. It is a management style where a single person decides based on his beliefs. There is very less involvement of other members from the group.

Auto means self, in Greek, and cratic refers to rule.

This type of leadership is mostly observed in businesses where there are fewer employees. Therefore, one member decides on behalf of the company. It is effective mostly when the company requires immediate decision-making. So the responsibility of decision and its outcome solely depends on the leader.

It is crucial in several workplace environments. This leadership is vital for companies that demand error-free outcomes. Although this style isn’t much known, it is widespread among organizations.

In this, we also observe that the group leader dictates. Also, he provides responsibilities to other members or employees, yet they do not get any recognition. Since reward and recognition are of utmost importance to boost morale.

Read more

Adaptive Leadership | Characteristics, Pros, and Cons

Precepts of Adaptive Leadership

A leadership style which was researched by Marty Linsky and Ron Heifetz is a framework of practical leadership that enhances people and company to become accustomed to change in the environment. And further, respond to the dilemmas effectively. It helps them to deal with considerable changes at an uncertain time.

Every company has ongoing problems. The leaders identify the systematic changes and deal with them. This adaptive leadership allows them to examine it accurately and then involves the entire company to deal with it. One can opt for this leadership when they find no easy solution.

Adaptive leaders formulate the strategies and practices to aid organizations and employees. They develop the capabilities which are required to compete in this challenging environment.

This adaptive leadership can be learned through specific training. For an adaptive leader, anyone from the organization can go ahead and take charge.

Read more

Charismatic Leadership | Qualities and Benefits of Charismatic Leadership

Charismatic Leadership

Charismatic leadership plays a significant role in motivating followers to get things done or improve. This is a method of energizing specific sense in others. This is attained by establishing eagerness in others to achieve a stated goal or vision.

This type of style believes in the persuasiveness and elegance of a leader. The leaders are also called “transformation leaders” at times as they share some common attributes. But the actual difference is the audience and focus.

When talking about a charismatic leader, Martin Luther King Jr. is always remembered. He had a dominant personality and a spirit which demanded change for the lives of numerous people. He was an influential orator who spoke for the change.

Read more

Bureaucratic Leadership | Definition, Pros, and Cons

Bureaucratic Leadership

Bureaucracy is one of the pillars of democracy. It is about governing societies with specific rules and regulations. The system is associated with controlling a country, company, or organization by providing several laws and rules which the members of it need to abide by.

As the term bureaucracy came into the world, several philosophers and thinkers began to examine it, which led them to introduce many definitions of bureaucracy.

Thinkers like Karl Marx and John Stuart Mill have evaluated the role of it as part of a functional society.

This is a management system that is utilized by large corporations still today. This leadership can have a massive impact if you have a highly regulated business environment. It is also very useful when used in companies that not require much creativity from members.

Read more

Tannenbaum Schmidt Leadership Continuum | Definition and Advantages

Tannenbaum Schmidt Leadership Continuum

Various leadership styles are exercised by organizations to ensure the well-functioning of their company. These styles also aid in maintaining a healthy environment. Depending on the leadership style, the growth of the brand is determined. Either it can production-oriented or relationship-oriented. The right to choose remains solely with the organization.

One such model is the Tannenbaum Schmidt Leadership Continuum model.

The model showcases the relationship between the level of authority; leader, and the liberty this leader provides to his team.

The contingency approach debates that a leadership style must be based on the type of circumstance encountered and not on personal fondness.

In this post, we will dive deep into the world of Tannenbaum Schmidt Leadership Continuum and understand how this leadership model plays a significant role in business management and leadership. So, without any more ado, let us get started with the definition-

Read more

Emotional Leadership | Meaning and Style,

Emotional Leadership Styles

Leadership styles have proved to help managers or leaders pave their way forward in terms of growth for the organization and maintaining a healthy working environment for their team members.

Depending on the need, leaders have been often seen to indulge in various leadership styles. Many times, leaders only focus on improving the statistics of their organization. As a result, they fail to sustain a pleasant working environment for their subordinates.

Thus, leaders need to devote equal attention to the emotional aspects as well. A leader must not only have the skills to complete tasks with efficiency. He must be skilled and experienced enough to maintain a peaceful environment and a healthy relationship with his employees. A leader who inherits both these traits is good.

Leadership effectiveness is dependent on particular circumstances and a perfect blend of leadership styles used over time. Misuse, overuse or under-use of powers can lead to mismanagement, hence, failure of the job.

Read more

Difference between Transformational Leadership and Transactional Leadership

Transformational Leadership

Transformational Leadership and Transaction Leadership are the two most important types of leadership that play a significant role in senior management roles.

In case you are also keen to understand both of these leaderships and their key differences, so you can opt for the one that is best suited for you then this post is personalized to you.

In this article, we will be covering both Transformation Leadership and Transaction Leadership separately, and then we will help you in understanding when you should opt for a particular kind of leadership via our Transformational Leadership vs. Transactional Leadership analysis.

So, without any further ado, let us get started with Transformational Leadership-

Read more

Seven Transformations of Leadership | Characteristics of Leadership

The Seven Transformations of Leadership (2)

Leadership is essential for the proper functioning of an organization. It helps in strategizing and systematically carrying out all the tasks and duties. Except for this, goals are met timely, employee relations are maintained at a decent level.

Many times, companies inculcate specific leadership techniques that aid in transformation.

These transformations are necessary for the growth of an organization and to sustain its position in the industry.

David Rooke is an American leadership enthusiast and co-founder of Harthill Consulting, who specializes in evolving leadership within organizations. On the other hand, William R. Torbert is an American professor whose genre is to manage the behavior within organizations. Both of them, in 2005, wrote the book ‘Seven Transformations of Leadership’.

In their book, they have not explicitly emphasized on any particular leadership philosophy but focused on the personality of leaders and their management technique.

Understanding the Seven Transformations of Leadership Model

There are seven critical transformations in executive leadership competence today in the world. These transformations form the progressive stages in adult maturity, also referred to as Vertical Learning. It is in contrast to horizontal learning which takes place within a stage.

Rooke and Torbert have described the following seven leadership styles:

  • Opportunists
  • Diplomats
  • Experts
  • Achievers
  • Individualists
  • Strategists, and
  • Alchemists

All these seven different leadership styles have been laid down, keeping in mind all sorts of leaders and their management styles.

Read more

Blake Mouton Managerial Grid | Advantages and Disadvantages

Blake Mouton Managerial Grid was developed by Robert Blake and Jane Mouton in 1964. It is also known as the leadership grid or managerial grid. This model identifies different leadership styles based on the concern of the manager for people and production.

Concern for people: this is the degree to which the leader takes into consideration the needs of his people, areas of development, etc. when deciding how a task is accomplished best.

Concern for results: concern for results is from leaders who emphasize only on objectives, organizational efficiency, and very high productivity. Their primary concern here is to increase and improve productivity at any cost.

Following are five different types of leadership styles as defined by Blake and Mouton:

Read more